{"id":17014,"date":"2021-07-05T09:00:28","date_gmt":"2021-07-05T13:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordpress-537697-2997182.cloudwaysapps.com\/?p=17014"},"modified":"2023-05-04T08:01:11","modified_gmt":"2023-05-04T12:01:11","slug":"evicting-people-into-homelessness-should-be-punished-as-a-violent-crime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wordpress-537697-2997182.cloudwaysapps.com\/evicting-people-into-homelessness-should-be-punished-as-a-violent-crime\/","title":{"rendered":"Evicting People Into Homelessness Should be Punished as a Violent Crime"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

Author and Stanford Law Professor David Alan Sklansky recently published a thought-provoking critique of the US criminal justice system in Time Magazine<\/a><\/em>. In brief, his article touched on the topic of our definition of a violent crime and how this definition shapes prison sentencing, ultimately determining who does and doesn’t wind up in jail. To quote directly from the source, Professor Sklansky states that:<\/p>\n

“The definition of a violent crime turns out to be highly arbitrary.”<\/em><\/p>\n

He then describes a “blurry line” between violent and nonviolent offenses, often working to the detriment of inmates of color and in favor of overzealous police officers.<\/p>\n

Professor Sklansky draws comparisons to how:<\/p>\n